Site icon Venture jolt

Trump’s Legal team asks for Special Master to go through Mar-a Lago evidence and determine if some should be return

The legal team of former President Donald Trump has requested that a federal judge appointed a “special master” to oversee the Justice Department’s return of any of his papers that were taken during the search at Mar-a-Lago two weeks ago.

According to a recent court document, Trump is requesting that the judge appoint a special master — a neutral attorney — to supervise the review of the evidence obtained from the beach club in the criminal investigation and to halt the work of federal investigators handling the evidence until the review is finished.

Must Watch-

The current lawsuit, which Trump’s legal team filed for the first time after FBI agents conducted their search on August 8, highlights how difficult it has been for the team to agree on a single course of action. Judge Aileen Cannon, whom Trump appointed to the bench in 2020, has been given the case.

Trump’s Legal team asks for Special Master to go through Mar-a Lago evidence and determine if some should be returned

Trump claims in the lawsuit that his constitutional rights were infringed and that perhaps confidential information was taken. Trump’s plea to the federal court in South Florida could face a difficult legal struggle because his staff missed numerous opportunities to contest the search, even though the legal maneuver could slow down the Justice Department’s continuing criminal probe.
The Justice Department is aware of this evening’s motion, and the United States will file its response in court, according to Anthony Coley, a spokesman for the department. “The Aug. 8 search warrant at Mar-a-Lago was authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause,” he added.

In the immediate wake of the search warrant execution, the ex-attorney President’s declined to take a side in court. They also remained silent, in the presence of one of his attorneys, on whether the search warrant affidavit should be made public before or during a court hearing last week in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Trump also requests a more thorough receipt of the items taken from Mar-a-Lago in the latest declaration. If approved, the request would be added to the two receipts the FBI had already given Trump’s team, each of which listed 33 things that had been taken into custody and were approved by Trump’s counsel after the search.

According to records that were just disclosed by a judge, the Justice Department took 11 sets of secret documents out of Trump’s house. The inventory reveals that some of the seized items were classified as “top secret/SCI,” which is one of the highest levels.

The government has already indicated that it is reviewing the confiscated items using an internal filter team to remove material that might be protected by privilege claims. For instance, while returning Trump’s private documents that wouldn’t be part of the investigation, including two expired passports and his diplomatic passport, investigators mentioned the work of a filter team.
In court records, the Justice Department stated that it thought the evidence it gathered at Mar-a-Lago will The government has already indicated that it is utilizing an internal filter team to examine the things that have been seized and isolate material that might be protected by privilege claims.

When returning Trump’s private documents that wouldn’t be part of the investigation, like two expired passports and his diplomatic passport, for example, investigators mentioned the work of a filter team. The search was authorized earlier this month after being reviewed by a federal magistrate court in the Southern District of Florida.

The judge is currently considering whether to reveal more information regarding the probe. Lindsey Halligan, Jim Trusty, and Evan Corcoran are the three lawyers that signed the motion. The document said that politics should not be allowed to interfere with the administration of justice.

The Mar-a-Lago search is described by Trump’s staff in his own words

In the filing, Trump’s attorneys put forward the former President’s narrative for how the search went down, the events leading up to it, and the fallout from it.
The lawsuit also recounted a message for Attorney General Merrick Garland that Trump’s lawyers gave to a top Justice Department official over the phone on August 11, a few days after the search.
“President Trump wants the Attorney General to know that he has been hearing from People all over the country about the raid,” Trump’s message said, according to the lawsuit. “If there was one word to describe their mood, it is ‘angry.’ The heat is building up. The pressure is building up. Whatever I can do to take the heat down, to bring the pressure down, just let us know.”

According to the document, on the day of the search, at 9:10 a.m. ET, Jay Bratt, the director of the national security division’s counterintelligence unit, called Donald Trump’s attorneys to inform them that a search warrant was being carried out at Mar-a-Lago.
Given the extensive help that President Trump has so far offered, a contentious conversation over why the government did not voluntarily ask to inspect the premises further occurred, according to the lawsuit.

According to Trump, the search required the assistance of twenty FBI officers and lasted nine hours. The lawsuit detailed a request by Bratt to turn off Mar-a-security Lago’s cameras, which the document claimed was denied. Also requested by Bratt were the names of any Trump legal counsel who could have just arrived at the search. The latest lawsuit asserts that Trump’s team requested access to the affidavit, but Bratt rejected their request.

The lawsuit stated that after being informed of this extraordinary event, “counsel for President Trump” contacted three local attorneys who volunteered to travel to Mar-a-Lago. “Once they arrived, they asked permission to enter the mansion to watch what the FBI operatives were doing, but the Government refused to grant their request.”

Trump and federal agents met in June to details

Additionally, Trump’s legal team gives much of the responsibility for what transpired in the investigation of the criminal records before the search by outlining their version of events for the first time. Trump’s team claims that during a meeting on June 3 where investigators visited Mar-a-Lago, “President Trump welcomed them in the dining room” and then said, “Whatever you need, just let us know.”

The petition states that after the storage room inspection, the investigators looked inside with Trump’s lawyer’s permission.
In response to the Justice Department’s request to secure the storage room in a letter sent five days later, “President Trump asked his staff to place a second lock on the door to the storage room, and one was added,” according to their report.

Additionally, according to Trump’s attorneys, the former President ordered that a Justice Department subpoena seeking video from Mar-a-Lago security cameras be accepted in late June. These investigation techniques have never before been publicly discussed in court.
According to persons familiar with the situation, The New York Times reported on Monday that even after the search, investigators are still looking for more security footage from Mar-a-Lago. Trump’s revelations might be relevant as a federal magistrate court evaluates the case’s transparency.

Last Monday, a lawyer for media outlets requesting access to the search warrant’s document claimed that the Justice Department’s account of the events, which Trump’s team has publicly narrated, should be made public. In connection with the investigation, the Justice Department has stated that it is looking into potential attempts to obstruct justice.

CNN and other media outlets have reported that a lawyer for Trump claimed there was no more classified material at Mar-a-Lago before the FBI search turned up several sets of documents with the designation “classified.” In addition to requesting the appointment of a special master, Trump and his attorneys used their lawsuit as a platform to voice some of his long-standing complaints about the FBI’s inquiry into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

In the lawsuit, “biassed FBI agents” were denounced as well as prominent figures involved in the Russia investigation, such as Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Christopher Steele, and Bruce Ohr, who all contributed to the initial FBI investigation into the web of connections between Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Kremlin.

This was mentioned by Trump in the lawsuit as part of his defense of the Justice Department’s and FBI’s anti-Trump prejudice and the notion that the Mar-a-Lago search was intended to ruin his political career.

New information has been added to this story. For more News checkout – venturejolt.com

Exit mobile version