Site icon Venture jolt

U.s. Department of Justice Sues Texas Over New Political Maps

The Justice Department sued Texas on Monday over the new district reorganization maps, saying the plans discriminate against minority voters, especially Latinos, who have fueled the State’s population boom.

The lawsuit alleges that the Republican State broke part of the voting rights law by drawing new district boundaries for its delegation to Congress and the state legislature. This is the first lawsuit by Biden’s Justice Department to challenge a state’s maps since states began redrafting their maps this year to accommodate population changes. 

The United States Department of Justice is a federal executive department of the United States government responsible for administering federal laws and the administration of justice in the States. It is equivalent to the ministries of justice or the interior of other countries.

Trump’s Social Media Venture to Raise About $1 Billion in Funds

Ulysses S. Grant founded it on July 1, 1870. Ulysses S. Grant was from the Republican Party. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has the mission to uphold the law and defend the people’s interests living in the United States.

Political maps do not show physical characteristics. Instead, they show state and national borders, the capital, and major cities.

Race Injustice Against People of Color

 The lawsuit notes that most of Texas’ population swelling over the past decade has come from blacks, Latinos and Asians, but argues that the new maps scatter those voters across districts, diluting their votes, and they’re refusing the possibility of choosing their representatives.

It also claims that the maps lock black and Latin communities into oddly shaped neighborhoods – one in Dallasarea is described as having the shape of a “seahorse” – preserving places for white Republicans.

“This is not the first time that Texas has taken steps to minimize the voting rights of its minority citizens,” Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta said at a press conference with Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Disney’s ‘Encanto’ Leads Another Quiet Weekend at Box Office

“Decade after decade, courts have found that Texas implemented reorganization plans that deliberately diluted the voting power of Latino and black voters and violated the Voting Rights Act.

The litigation comes as Republicans and Democrats vie for an advantage in the district’s reorganization process, which has already reached new levels of fraud. The Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that it will not adjudicate partisan fraud disputes, cards designed to benefit a political party. 

 Texas Defending Its Position

Texas has to defend its cards in court after every restriction process since the Voting Rights Act came into effect in 1965. But it will be the first time since a U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The case is the second civil rights lawsuit that Biden’s administration has recently filed against Texas.

Last month, he filed a lawsuit to cancel the State’s new election law amid a wave of GOP-backed voting changes, arguing that the new restrictions would deprive citizens of the State. 

Voting Rights

The lawsuit and others that civil rights groups and Democrats have already filed challenging the Texas maps may not make a difference until next year’s election. It may take several years to reorganize the litigation. The Biden administration’s case will be heard by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most conservative in the country.

Early-stage Vc Firm 8iventures Has Launched Its Second Fund That Seeks to Raise $50m.

It remains illegal for cartographers to discriminate based on race while drawing legislative lines. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits line workers from mixing the voting power of minorities by disbanding them between districts and preventing them from choosing their preferred candidates.

The lawsuit says that the Texas Congress map was drawn with a substantial contribution from its Republican delegation to Congress, which is all white except for a Latin representative. At the time, State Democrats strongly opposed the process and the results. 

Exit mobile version